Jacked In

Jacked In

”The sky above the port was the color of tele­vi­sion, tuned to a dead chan­nel.” William Gib­son, Neu­ro­mancer, 1986

Gibson’s first novel, con­sid­ered by many in the sci-fi world as one of the best in the genre, (I am have not read enough to make this claim, but I can say it blew my mind from the open­ing line above [one of the best I have ever read] all the way to the end) fore­told of a vast tech­nol­ogy and infor­ma­tion grid that a per­son could access by jack­ing in. It was the web before the web.

Now we are all jacked in, but I am not sure I feel con­nected to you. I am also not sure I don’t. I feel some­thing, but I am not sure if it is con­nec­tion. I feel jacked in. I know lit­tle bits of this and that of you, but I don’t know that I am friends with you. Through social net­works (does not rhyme with ”friend”) I am allowed to see lit­tle bits of what­ever you con­sider your best for the day. And you get to see what I have to offer – after hair and make up have finished.

Being friends though, is some­thing dif­fer­ent. David Whyte talked about this at a read­ing this week­end here in Bend. He said friend­ships are the result of acts of ser­ial for­give­ness. The peo­ple I stay in con­tact with after I have hurt them and after they have hurt me have the poten­tial to become real friends. These are peo­ple who I have released from the hurt I think they caused me. In order for this to hap­pen, this ser­ial for­give­ness, we need to be in some prox­im­ity. FB and Tweets don’t let you see my gnarly, self­ish side enough for you to love me. I am eas(y)(ier) to love on line, and so are you. I want the other parts. I want the parts of a rela­tion­ship that show up after we take the chance of blow­ing each other off at a crit­i­cal moment and then cir­cling back and admit­ting that I was not ready to par­tic­i­pate and say­ing that now, yes, it’s me and I am here.

I am not look­ing to be hurt­ful for its own sake, only human, which includes the very human traits of unre­li­a­bil­ity, sloth, decep­tion, etc as well as the other, sex­ier stuff. Putting roots into a per­son requires the pain and the plea­sure. We need, I need, both. I need room to screw up and be for­given. I need to get out of me long enough to see your side of some­thing and let you off the hook. I need that.

That part of rela­tion­ships is at risk by the use of infi­nitely editable snip­pets – like, uh, blogs, for instance. Jack­ing in is very dif­fer­ent than show­ing up. Even the act of being in each other’s pres­ence is a kind of very per­sonal inti­macy. I often trade it for the dead tv-colored light that glows through your fea­tures, life­less and beau­ti­ful and really per­fect, on my 15” screen.

Let’s go get some tea.

Share
This entry was posted in Bend Light, Street Photography and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Jacked In

  1. Bobbi says:

    AMEN brother, AMEN!!! I had been think­ing of writ­ing a post about this very topic but I know that I could never say it as well as this. Tidy work this.

    I’m in for tea…

    Bobbi

  2. P. Voyles says:

    I do agree with this to an extent, but I also believe peo­ple let peo­ple in with writ­ing that they never would do in per­son. Writ­ing is a dif­fer­ent type of inti­macy. Writ­ing exposes a part of a per­son that some peo­ple never get to meet or understand.

  3. Snautty says:

    I just started an online forum for searchers. Peo­ple who want to con­nect with like-minded thinkers. Totally anony­mous. If you’re inter­ested, reply back and I’ll send you the link. I think you would enjoy the peo­ple there.

  4. Debby says:

    Cur­rently in the midst of a con­flict with a good friend, and also in a big shift around self-acceptance and ten­der­ness, I thor­oughly enjoyed your post. Really nice writ­ing, as well as what you have to say. Thank you.

  5. stephenarcher says:

    Hi Debby,
    Thank you for writ­ing. I am happy that you found it use­ful. I hope you hang around, and I also hope that you find the res­o­lu­tion with your friend, as well as the resolve within you to get to that resolution…

  6. Pingback: Tea With Dr. Stephen | Finding Me in France

  7. Carrie Wehmeyer says:

    This really res­onated for me. My hus­band and I have been talk­ing about friends vs “friends” off and on for weeks now. (he opti­mizes web­sites for social media) I like the notion of ser­ial for­give­ness. I think it really puts a point on the con­cept of friend­ship. As some­one who was your friend all through ele­men­tary (for bet­ter or worse, right?) I am hon­ored to still be con­sid­ered such.

  8. stephenarcher says:

    Hi CAr­rie, thank you very much for this reply. And yes, we were and are friends still, even though years feel longer than the num­ber of miles between us…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>